Warning issued to prevent accidents in Freezing Weather conditions
The Health & Safety Authority has issued recommendations to employers & workers in light of the recent cold snap.
The advise is timely and is of benefit to employers and employees alike in reducing accidents in the workplace.
‘Freezing temperatures renders construction work even more hazardous than normal. When the body is unable to warm itself, cold related stress may result. Four factors contribute to cold stress: cold air temperatures, high velocity air movement, dampness of the air and contact with cold water or surfaces. A cold environment forces the body to work harder to maintain its temperature. Cold air, water, and snow all draw heat from the body. Wind chill is the combination of air temperature and wind speed.
Risk Assessments need to be reviewed as extreme low temperatures greatly change and usually increase the risks associated with most external construction work. The following areas of work are particularly adversely affected by extreme cold conditions:
- Work at Height – work at height platforms, roofwork, etc. will all become more hazardous if ice or snow are on them. The risks of falls from heights are increased as the risk of slips, etc. is greatly increased. This type of work should only be undertaken if absolutely necessary and sufficient additional controls are put in place. For example – full check of all platforms and fall/edge protection, de-icing of work platforms, etc.
- Slips, Trips & Falls –the risk of these are greatly increased due to icy conditions. Walkways should be cleared of ice and snow with regular gritting/ salting. Ensure hoses, etc. aren’t left running in areas as the excess water will freeze and cause a further slip hazard.
- Construction plant operation –
- caution must be exercised when accessing or egressing from construction plant as access steps and hand hold surfaces may be covered in ice.
- wheel grip could be compromised and control of vehicles could be lost
- Welfare Facilities – arrangements must be in place to provide adequate welfare facilities, especially an area where workers can go to warm up, change/dry clothes and get hot beverages.
The following should be noted when risk assessing and planning for construction work in extreme cold temperatures.
Cold Temperature Exposures, Injuries, and Controls on the Jobsite
1. Wearing the proper clothes / PPE may be the most significant precaution to reducing cold stress. Wearing appropriate clothes for cold weather usually involves using three or more layers of clothing. Also use layering to protect the head, hands and feet.
2. Drink plenty of fluids, preferably warm, sweet beverages. Thirst is suppressed in a cold environment and dehydration may occur when fluid intake is reduced.
3. Increase caloric intake when working in cold environments. Workers in cold environments who wear heavy, protective clothing expend more heat and so require 10-15 percent more calories.
4. If required, a work warm-up schedule should be used to provide periodic times for warm-up breaks. Additional breaks should be provided as the wind velocity increases and/or the temperature drops.
5. Avoid the cold if you are becoming exhausted or immobilised. These conditions can accelerate the effects of cold weather.
6. Engineering controls can be effective such as using heaters in areas, where practical, shielding work areas from winds and drafts, using insulating material on equipment handles, especially metal handles, etc.
7. Select the warmest hours of the day, where possible, when braving the cold. Minimise activities that reduce circulation.
8. Educate employees on symptoms of cold-related stresses: heavy shivering, uncomfortable coldness, severe fatigue, drowsiness and/or euphoria.
9. Use the buddy system.Work in pairs when working in extreme weather conditions so partners can monitor one another and obtain help quickly in an emergency.’
It is clear that extra vigilance is required when the weather such as recently experienced comes to bother us!
Paul Tracey
20/01/2010
Death of Polish brings fine of €350,000
Death of Polish Worker brings fine of €350,000.
In what seems to be a too familiar reoccurrence a tragic accident has taken the life of a polish worker working in Ireland
The accident which occurred in April 2006 was the matter for a court hearing this month in which the Health & Safety Authority brought a prosecution against a Roscommon based building company.
The accident which led to the tragedy involved a fall from a teleporter.
Roscommon Circuit court found that there was a failure to put in place necessary safety measures and as a result the death had occurred.
Fines of €350,000 were imposed on the company & its director.
Whilst cases of this nature primarily concerns the enforcement of safety practice breaches of Health and Safety legislation can also lead to civil action for compensation for the loss of life and financial dependency.
A representative of the Health and Safety Authority commented ‘that the case should be a deterrent to other directors and senior managers who are not talking the legal and moral duties seriously.’
The significant numbers of Polish workers who have worked and continue to work in the construction industry in Ireland mean that this is not the only report of tragic loss of life as a result of carelessness and neglect by an employer.
Paul W Tracey
11/12/2009
Compensation for injuries in the workplace. Statistics form 2008
Some interesting data has been released by the Injuries Board in a publication entitled ’ A review of employer Liability Awards 2008 ‘which gives an insight into the types of accidents that occur in Ireland.
Apart from data on the awards which injured persons were made the report sets out anumber of examples of cases dealt with.
Given that the bulk of the cases are presented by solicitors it shows that the scheme seems to be operating in a reasonably successful manner.
The key to having a satisfactory result appears to lie in the presentation of the case in the best possible fashion.
Clearly cases where the extent of injuries ,out of pocket expenses and future losses are not properly addressed claimants can loose out.
On that basis it appears that solicitors continue to have a significant role to play in securing the best results for their clients.
Solicitors’ experience on court awards and the fact that insurers very often do not respond with the threat of court proceedings help secure better awards for clients.
The sample cases make interesting reading and we have selected some for you to read, comments as always welcome!
Paul Tracey
Litigation solicitor
Paul W Tracey
Solicitors
01-8745656
e mail law@traceysolicitors.ie
Sample Cases
While working as a bar tender in her local hotel, Siobhán suffered lacerations to her left wrist due to broken glass that had not been cleared. This transpired to be quite a serious injury as the nerves and tendons in Siobhan’s wrist had been damaged. This damage was subsequently repaired with surgery. She was out of work for approximately four weeks and has regular physiotherapy sessions to restore the strength, dexterity and sensation in her fingers. An award of just over €37,000 in compensation was made.
Edward, an engineer, fell from a height of 10ft when the scaffolding he was working on collapsed underneath him. He suffered a broken wrist and lacerations to his ear and eyelid when scaffold poles fell on him. His injury resulted in some reduction in his hand movement and strength, some mild hearing loss and he still has scarring on his ear. He was awarded just under €39,000 in compensation.
Paddy
This gentleman had to have his left index finger amputated when it was severed due to a defective power saw he was working with on a construction site. The tool was not fitted with a safety guard. As a result of his injury, Paddy will have lifelong disability and loss of grip in his left hand. He avoids working with power tools on-site and often finds some social situations awkward. He was awarded just over €59,500; part of this award was for loss of earnings.
Nuala
Nuala, a deli worker, was injured due to defective equipment when she was dismantling an advertising board in the restaurant where she worked. She suffered a crush injury with lacerations to her left index finger which required plastic surgery. In cold weather particularly, she still suffers from numbness and decreased function in the tip of her finger and finds sewing, previously a hobby of hers, most uncomfortable. Nuala’s claim was processed and she was awarded just over €23,000.
William
He sustained a chemical burn to his lower legs whilst working in a pharmaceutical plant. He had not been provided with the correct protective uniform. These burns required corrective plastic surgery and some scarring still remains. William must now be extra vigilant regarding day to day sun exposure. William’s claim was processed and he was awarded over €28,000 in compensation.
Claire, a factory worker, was operating a rotation machine when it suddenly jammed. A broken part of the machine was then released and struck her in the face causing injury and lacerations to her face and mouth and also causing damage to her teeth. This injury required extensive reconstructive work and will require additional treatment in the future. She was awarded €53,000 in General and Special Damages, this allows for costs incurred for future dental work.
As a member of the restaurant service staff, Cormac a student, slipped on a wet floor that had just been mopped but there was no warning sign displayed. The tray of crockery that he was carrying broke and he suffered deep lacerations to his left hand. This injury required three separate surgical operations to fully repair the damaged tendons and Cormac was unable to work for several months. He still has reduced movement in his hand but regularly attends for physiotherapy to aid this. His claim was processed and he was awarded just over €40,000 in compensation.
Joe sustained a twisting, sprain injury when he slipped and fell while descending a defective staircase in the office. Due to the severity of his ligament injury and the nature of his job. Joe was unable to work for approximately four months as he was on crutches. His claim was processed he was awarded just over €20,000 in Damages, this includes a figure for Loss of earnings
While working as a warehouse operative, Julia was required to engage in repetitive bending and lifting of heavy boxes. Her employer had not enlisted her on a Safety Manual Handling course and subsequently she suffered acute lower back pain. Julia was unable to work and could not socialise with friends for several weeks. She was awarded just over €30,000.
Tim
Tim, a driver was temporarily blinded when a defective electrical heater in the depot exploded, releasing debris which had to be removed from his eyes. Tim now has slight blurring of vision in his left eye and suffers regular discomfort to his eyes. Tim received just under €11,000 in compensation.
Dublin Bikes prove a big hit- but what about insurance for accidents?
The Dublin Bikes scheme has proved a big hit with Dubliners and visitors to the city since its launch in September.
One interesting legal issue arising from the use of the bikes is the question of insurance in case of an accident.
What happens if a cyclist hits a pedestrian and injures him or her whilst using one of these bicycles?
Well one thing is clear the promoters of the scheme have set out their position on their website in their terms and conditions section, it reads as follows;
‘You are not insured by the provider to use dublinbikes and you do so entirely at your own risk. It is advised that you take out your own public liability insurance if you do not have such a policy already in place.’
Well cycling safely is clearly the first step. It would also be a good idea to check your household insurance policy and see if it covers the householder in the use of a bicycle and more particularly the use of a hired bicycle!
Visitors to our site might let us know what response they get from their insurance company’s on this topic.
Safe cycling!
Paul Tracey
November 2009
Personal Injuries lump sum compensation-lump sums system criticised.
An economist speaking in Dublin recently criticised the merits
of lump sum settlements as opposed to structured settlements.
The speaker Colm McCarty called for a debate on a change from the current system
where a victim of an accident gets a lump sum for their injuries and where relevant a sum to cover future loss and expenses and called for a debate on the concept of a structured settlement.
Structured settlements are common in a number of European countries and involve the victim getting an initial payment followed by an annuity.
Whilst a debate is to be welcomed on the subject the question may victims might ask would be who would manage their ‘lump sums’?
In light of recent economic conditions insurance companies and financial advisers would have some distance to go to win the trust of victims that their investment skills could meet this task.
The challenge for insurance companies will be the fact that cases could not be ‘closed off’ for many years leading to additional administration costs into the future.
The debate is an interesting one and one certainly set to run for some time.
In the meantime it goes without saying that prudent investment of settlement monies is essential for all victims of accidents in order to ensure that the resources are available to fund potential future expenses.
Paul Tracey
November 2009
Phone Texts feature in Car Accident case.
In a recent case heard in Limerick the alleged use of a phone came into play
in the trial of a driver involved in a collision that claimed the life of two emergency workers
A court heard evidence that a mobile phone which was found on the driver’s side of a car which had been involved in a collision contained a number of text messages and calls made shortly before the accident.
The driver involved denied these allegations and the charges of dangerous driving causing the death
The accident involved the death of a garda and a fireman in road traffic accident back in 2007 and came on for hearing in Limerick recently
Apart from the obvious risks of texting or phoning whilst driving the case emphasises the potential admissibility of phone records into court in the event of a subsequent accident.
The case should act as a reminder to all drivers that distractions to drivers can have fatal
Effects and the availability of records of texting or of phone calls may feature in any subsequent prosecutions for dangerous, careless or more serious driving offences
Paul Tracey
November2009
Fatal Accidents – legal entitlements
In the case of a person suffers personal injury of such degree that they die of the injuries where liability (or fault) would lie in favour of the injured person, namely, where some otherperson is at fault for the injuries, the injured person’s right of action for compensation for pain and suffering ceases with the death of the injured person.
However, in these cases, under the Civil Liability Act 1961, a right of action continues, on the death of the injured person, in favour of the dependents(relatives) of the deceased person.
The method for the assessment of damages will differ from those applicable to a claim for ordinary personal injuries.
Instead, damages are calculated by reference to the Civil Liability Act in the sum of €25,394
Other headings of claim can be added to this namely financial loss to the dependents of the deceased person, arising from the death.
Loss arising from the absence of income would make up, by and large the greater share of this loss.
Funeral and travel expenses are recoverable.
In such cases the settlement of any such cases must be approved by the courts.
If you’d like further advise on this topic please contact Paul Tracey Solicitors at 01 8745656
or e mail law@traceysolicitors.ie
Pesonal Injuries : Higher Number of High Court cases issued in 2008
The Courts services report shows an increase in the number of High Court caes commenced for personal injuries in 2008.
A total of 6,466 such cases were issued and increase of nearly 10% on the 2007 figure of 5951 such cases.
The data gives an indication that in the ‘post celtic tiger ‘ era people may be paying more attention to pursuing their rights than in previous years.
These cases would include, car accidents, work accidents, pedestrian accidents, bicycle accidents and accidents in public places
Of course the vast majority of these cases settle prior to court hearing with many never seeing the inside of a court.
The data seems to contract recent suggestions from the injuries board that ‘claims’ may be on the decrease.
It is also important to note that with a reduced period within which to initiate cout proceedings and the streamlining of timelines due to the Injuries Board process it may also suggest that more cases are being heard in less time than in previous years.
The volume of cases processes by the High Court on a daily basis is a credit to the Judiciary & Court staff who continue to work to provide a most effective service.
Paul Tracey
12/08/2009
Personal Injuries
Injuries Board report shows average public liability award to injured persons was €22,865
The Injuries Board has reported that during the two year period from January 2007 to December 2008 it made 2,859 awards in public liability claims cases. The Board awarded compensation totalling €65,400,000. The average award was €22,885. This compares with an average award of €20,792 to PL claimants in 2007.
In a report issued recently- A Review of Public Liability Awards 2007 & 2008 – the Injuries Board gave details of:
- awards
- location of accidents
- causes of accidents
- type of injury suffered.
The average award was €22,865.
Most awards were for less than €38,000, the upper limit of awards the Circuit Court can make.
While only 0.5% of awards were for over €100,000, that in fact means that 14 awards of €100,000 or more were made by the Board.
Over 350 awards (12.5%) of between €38,000 and €100,000 were made.
Thirty-two percent of awards (914) of between €20,000 and €38,000 were made. Fifty-five percent (1,572) of all awards were for less that €20,000.
Over a quarter of all awards (27%) were made against local authorities in relation to accidents in public places under the control of local authorities.
Nearly a quarter of all awards (24%) were made in respect of accidents in retail and shopping outlets. The other locations of accidents were:
- hotels, pubs, clubs, restaurants (19%)
- leisure facilities (13%)
- transport/utilities (6%)
- education and health establishments (4%)
The remaining 6% of accidents occurred in a variety of locations, including construction sites and car parks.
A remarkable 67% of the accidents were caused by slips, trips and falls.
The other causes of accidents were flying/falling objects (11%),
-injury caused by machinery (5%), cuts (3%),
-burns/scalds, assaults and animals (each 2%),
-one percent each for poisoning and reaction.
-the remaining 6% were attributed to other causes.
The review shows that many accident victims sustain at least two types of injury. The most common injuries suffered are sprains (40%), bruising (32%), fractures (29%), lacerations/cuts (25%) and injuries classified as superficial (10%).
Four percent of awards were for psychological disorders, with crush, intracranial, dislocation and burns each accounting for 2% of injuries.
Seven percent of injuries are classified in the other category.
Given that many of those injured suffer from one or more of the types of injuries listed, the total adds up to 155%.
The review reports that 70% of awards were made to women and while people of all ages suffer accidents, half of all awards went to people aged over 45.
The report provides a valuable insight for workplace owners, drivers and local authorities as to where there focus should be in an effort to prevent such accidents.
Paul Tracey solicitors has specialised in the provision of assistance to injured parties for over 20 years,it’s principal welcomed the publication of the report of the injuries board data which was hitherto unavailable from the court services
Paul Tracey
7th August 2009
Personal injuries suffered by schoolboy in Dog Attack -Settlement offer approved by court!
A young boy who received severe injuries following an attack by a dog has received €17,500 euros in damages following the approval of a settlement offer in the Dublin Circuit court.
The 12-year-old schoolboy who was bitten on the arm by a neighbour’s dog, the court was told and his arm had been punctured in three places and he received 17 stitches.
The case highlights the importance of keeping dogs under ‘effective control’ as required by the law.
in cases where householders & dog owners do not have household insurance they can find themselves in the position of having to personally compensate victims in such cases.
Paul Tracey
24/07/2009
