Hip failures affect over 3,000 patients in Ireland

August 30, 2010 by admin · Leave a Comment
Filed under: Accidents, Injury Law 

It has emerged that nearly 3,500 Irish people have received a replacement hip system which is at the centre of a worldwide recall.

There are two devices at the centre of the recall, these are known as, the ASR XL Acetabular System and the DePuy ASR Hip Resurfacing System.

It has been reported that most hip replacements involving the ASR system have been successful.

DePuy which are owned by healthcare company Johnson and Johnson have stated that according to the data in the UK,  patients with the implants required revision surgery or corrective procedures within five years in about 12 per cent of the cases.

The company have said that this was higher than expected resulting in the recall.

It has been reported that problems arising with the ASR device include loosening parts, infections, fractures, dislocation, metal sensitivity and pain.

What would be of concern for the public is that apparantly complaints had been made 2 years ago to the Department of Food and Drug Administration in the US concerning two types of faulty hip implants, questions may now be raised as to why it has taken so long for the recall to be implemented.  

DePuy, have stated that they will pay for the cost of doctor visits, tests and procedures associated with the recall.

Whilst it is early days yet it appears that databases are currently being checked in Ireland for patients who received this type of implant. Early reports suggest a review with hospital & consultants may follow to decide the best way forward.

The news is clearly a worry for people who may have to undergo further surgery , recovery  and loss of earnings during their recouperation.

From a legal perspective it is clear that the manufacturers have admitted the fault and in such circumstances victims of this ‘systems failure’ should not be out of pocket for any expenses they incur.

Where additional surgery has to be undertaked along with the anticipated pain during the recovery process it is clear that these patients may be entitled to compensation.

Paul Tracey

Paul W Tracey Solicitors

30 August 2010

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Sphinn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • HelloTxt
  • Netvibes
  • Print

Bad Behavior has blocked 52 access attempts in the last 7 days.